International Identifier for serials
and other continuing resources, in the electronic and print world

Navigating the Retraction Minefield in China and Beyond: A Need for Systemic Changes and Increased Focus on Researcher Well-Being

The recent nationwide audit of retracted research papers in China has shed light on significant challenges within the academic community. This audit, initiated by the Chinese Government, marks a crucial point in the pursuit of research integrity within China’s academic landscape. By actively initiating audits and supporting initiatives aimed at enhancing research integrity, government funding bodies send a clear message to researchers that accountability and transparency are paramount. Authors must recognize their responsibility not only to the academic community but also to those who fund their research endeavors.

Presentación del descubridor de artículos Latindex /Latindex’ Scholarly Articles Discovery Service

Con la asistencia de autoridades académicas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), el 11 de abril de 2024, se realizó la presentación virtual (vía Zoom y YouTube) del Descubridor de Artículos de Latindex. Este nuevo servicio, permite a los usuarios del Sistema descubrir y recuperar artículos académicos provenientes de revistas iberoamericanas que por su apego a criterios de calidad editorial, han pasado a formar parte del Catálogo Latindex 2.0.

On 11 April 2024, the new Article Discovery Service of Latindex was launched with the support of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The online event was transmitted via Zoom and YouTube to a community of potential users interested in discovering new sets of academic information.  Through the discovery service, users will be able to search among half a million articles harvested to date. These articles come from a set of scientific journals (Catálogo 2.0) covering all disciplines of knowledge and published in the 21 Ibero-American countries that are part of the network, plus the Ibero-Americanist journals published in North America, Asia, and Europe.

DOAJ and Crossref renew their partnership to support the least-resourced journals

A stylised "20" in green geometric shapes next to the text "20 years of DOAJ".             

Both organisations agreed to work together in 2021 in a variety of ways, but primarily to encourage the dissemination and use of scholarly research using online technologies, regional and international networks, partners and communities, helping to build local institutional capacity and sustainability around the world. The new agreement, signed in early March 2024, will slightly shift focus to build upon existing collaborations, particularly around metadata. One of the primary sections of the MOU is enhancing support for the least-resourced journals.

Study on scientific publishing in Europe

This study provides a deeper understanding of the issues around practices and costs of scholarly publications, offers an analysis of the situation, and proposes advice for policy actions. The report documents the pervasive lack of information on contracts and deals with publishers and recommends specific actions, mostly required on the side of the member states, institutions and libraries to enhance transparency regarding the costs of publishing. These include, among others, publishing the contracts and working on making available structured information about them.

How to avoid being duped by predatory journals

Some journals capitalise on researchers’ and clinicians’ need for publications by luring them in with flattering emails, only to subject them to poor editing practices and threatening invoices. Instead of relying on (white) lists of journals, Dominic Mitchell / DOAJ recommends researchers learn what to look for when submitting a paper. Precisely, Think. Check. Submit is an initiative set up by several international scholarly publishing associations to make researchers more aware of what to look for when submitting to a journal.

Reference Coverage Analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus

OpenAlex is a promising open source of scholarly metadata, and competitor to the Web of Science and Scopus. As OpenAlex provides its data freely and openly, it permits researchers to perform bibliometric studies that can be reproduced in the community without licensing barriers. However, as OpenAlex is a rapidly evolving source and the data contained within is expanding and quickly changing, the question naturally arises as to the trustworthiness of its data. In this paper, the reference and metadata coverage within each database will be studied and compared with each other.

Download study as a PDF

The situation has become appalling: fake scientific papers push research credibility to crisis point

Can AI do reliable review scientific articles? / ¿Puede la IA hacer arbitrajes confiables de artículos científicos?

Image of two overlapping screens with words on a purple background generated by Google DeepMind

The cost of reviewing scientific publications, both in terms of money and time spent, is growing to unmanageable proportions with current methods. It is necessary to use AI as a trust system and thus free up human resources for research tasks. It would be important for SciELO to progressively incorporate AI modules for evaluation in its preprints server as a new advance and development of the technologies it manages. Available in Spanish only.

El costo del arbitraje de las publicaciones científicas, tanto en dinero como en el tiempo que se le dedica, crece a proporciones inmanejables con los métodos actuales. Se impone usar la IA como un sistema de confianza y así liberar recursos humanos para tareas de investigación. Sería importante que SciELO incorporara progresivamente módulos de IA para la evaluación en su servidor de preprints como un nuevo avance y desarrollo de las tecnologías que maneja.

Launch of Scopus AI to Help Researchers Navigate the World of Research

Elsevier, a global leader in scientific information and data analytics, today launches Scopus AI – a generative AI product to help researchers and research institutions get fast and accurate summaries and research insights that support collaboration and societal impact.

Scopus AI is based on Scopus’ trusted content from over 27,000 academic journals, from more than 7,000 publishers worldwide, with over 1.8 billion citations, and includes over 17 million author profiles. Scopus content is vetted by an independent board of world-renowned scientists and librarians who represent the major scientific disciplines.

Trust in Scholarly Publishing